Lokalaugenschein: Schwall-Belastung tötet Jungfische und Fischlarven am Inn – WWF und Tiroler Fischereiverband fordern umfassende Sanierung der Schwall-Belastung durch Tiwag und Verbund in Tirol
Thousands of new dams threaten EU´s largest river system
Belgrade, Bucharest, Munich, Sofia, Vienna, Zagreb, June 26th, 2012 – At a high-level meeting of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River tomorrow in Innsbruck, Austria, representatives of Danube basin countries discuss for the first time how to prevent new hydropower projects from damaging river ecosystems of the 800.000 km2 large basin. The NGO networks WWF, the International Association for Danube Research (IAD), the European Anglers Alliance (EAA) and the Danube Environmental Forum (DEF) call for basin wide criteria for identifying ecologically important river landscapes too valuable for energy production.
“We call on governmental authorities to agree on a minimum set of common criteria for mapping those river sections of highest need for protection in order to fulfil the EU-wide binding Water Framework Directive and nature conservation objectives” Irene Lucius of WWF Danube Carpathian Programme said, while Gerhard Nagl of the Danube Environmental Forum (DEF) stressed: “Without clear-binding international rules for river biodiversity protection in the Danube River Basin our last free flowing rivers, a rarity in Europe, will be sacrificed for short-sighted interests without solving the world´s burning climate change problems.”
In Austria, for example, damming the last rivers with hydropower potential would help meeting the growing energy demand of the country for five years only, but causing not reversible damage to the remaining 13 percent of intact rivers. In the German Danube land of Bavaria, hydropower potential is largely exhausted while the remaining natural rivers stretches are jewels to be protected for future generations.
In many Danube basin countries, such as Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Serbia, and Ukraine, the potential for increasing energy efficiency and therefore lowering the demand for energy is enormous. This shows that only a mix of measures, first of all energy saving and the use of different renewable energy sources can be the long-term solution.
Many planned hydro-dams would be situated in protected areas or would severely harm these, and therefore counteract the protection efforts on national and EU-wide level. It is therefore of paramount importance not to locate new plants in areas where ecological value is highest, and so to reduce damage. As the environment knows no borders, areas of high and low ecological importance should be defined on the basin level, not nationally, but Danube governments are hesitant to allow such “interference” for the common good. In the opinion of NGOs, the International Commission for the Protection of Danube River must therefore over the coming months facilitate agreement by Danube basin countries to respect exclusion areas, where hydropower development is not allowed in order to maintain outstanding natural values.
“More than 80 million inhabitants of the Danube basin profit from the multitude of ecosystem services provided by healthy rivers: from providing natural retention areas soaking up flood waters to producing fish and drinking water” says Helmut Belanyecz of the European Anglers Alliance (EAA). “The wave of new hydropower plants puts these vital functions at risk. Although hydropower is more climate-friendly than fossil fuels plants, other options exist that can meet climate and energy goals more sustainably,” Jürg Bloesch of IAD adds.
Hydropower plants impact river systems in various ways. Their dams prevent fish and other organisms from moving to their spawning or feeding grounds. They also alter the natural shape and movement of rivers, which changes both river and floodplain habitats of e.g. birds and diminish the self-cleaning properties of rivers.
Note for editors
The 14 countries of the Danube basin working together under the umbrella of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) have decided to develop “Guiding Principles on Hydropower Development”. Several regional NGO networks, in particular WWF, IAD, EEA and DEF, participate in this process as observers. Besides a “concept of a strategic planning approach for facilitating hydropower development in accordance with relevant legislation in the context of renewable energy, water management, flood protection, biodiversity and nature protection”, the document will also provide guidance for reducing environmental impact of individual plants.
Contacts:
Irene Lucius, Head of Policy, WWF Danube Carpathian Programme, Vienna, Tel. +43676842728215, E-Mail: ilucius@wwfdcp.org
Jürg Bloesch, International Association for Danube Research (IAD), Zurich, Tel.: +41522123638, E-Mail: bloesch@eawag.ch,
Helmut Belanyecz, Österreichisches Kuratorium für Fischerei und Gewässerschutz (ÖKF)/EAA, Vienna, Tel. +43 664/252 7264, E-Mail: helmut.belanyecz@kone.com
Gerhard Nagl, Danube Environmental Forum (DEF), Deggendorf; Tel. +499913831609,
E-Mail: gerhard.nagl@donaufluss.de
Roland Gramling, WWF Germany, Press Officer, Berlin, Tel. +49 30 / 311 777 425, E-Mail: roland.gramling@wwf.de
Rückfragen
News
Aktuelle Beiträge
WWF: Neue Umfrage zeigt Kaunertal-Absage und Reformbedarf der TIWAG
Geplanter Ausbau Kraftwerk Kaunertal ist schon für Hälfte der Bevölkerung nicht akzeptabel – Zwei Drittel für alternativen Standort bei naturverträglichen Alternativen – 80 Prozent fordern Reformen bei TIWAG
Good News: Griechenland verbietet Fischerei mit Grundschleppnetzen
Als erstes Land in der EU verbietet Griechenland die zerstörerische Fischerei-Methode ab 2030 in allen Meeresschutzgebieten.
Tag zum Schutz der Alpen: WWF fordert Schutz alpiner Freiräume
Ausbau des Kraftwerks Kaunertal und Verbauung freier Gletscherflächen gefährden überlebenswichtige Ökosysteme – WWF fordert Stopp des Kaunertalprojekts und Unterschutzstellung der Gletscherflächen
EU-Renaturierungsgesetz: WWF kritisiert “fahrlässige Blockade” der Bundesländer
Weichenstellung für ganz Europa aus populistischen und längst ausgeräumten Gründen blockiert – Bundesländer sind größte Gefahr für Ernährungssicherheit in Österreich
WWF warnt am Welt-Thunfisch-Tag vor Ökosystem-Kollaps durch Überfischung
Thunfische spielen Schlüsselrolle in Meeres-Ökosystemen – Umweltschutzorganisation WWF fordert verstärkte Kontrollen gegen illegale Fischerei
EU-Renaturierungsgesetz: 170 Wissenschaftler:innen fordern Ja der Bundesländer
WWF initiiert Appell der Wissenschaft an die Landeshauptleute: Renaturierungsgesetz wäre einmalige Chance für Natur, Klimaschutz und Ernährung – Warnung vor Scheitern
WWF fordert Absage der Kraftwerksprojekte an der Isel
Intakte Flussstrecken sind wesentlich in Klima- und Biodiversitätskrise – Land Tirol muss Kraftwerkspläne stoppen und Naturschutzgebiet ausweisen – EU-Renaturierungsgesetz entscheidend für Zukunft intakter Flussstrecken
WWF-Erfolg: Neue Drau-Seitenarme sorgen für mehr Artenvielfalt, Klima- und Hochwasserschutz
WWF Österreich und kroatische Projektpartner stellen natürlichen Fluss an Teilen der Drau wieder her – EU-Renaturierungsgesetz als Antwort auf Klima- und Biodiversitätskrise gefordert